DMARC Record Audit
Audit a DMARC record. Reports an absent or unrecognised policy tag, which makes the whole record ignored; a pct below 100, where the policy applies to that share of failing mail and the rest is treated as none, so a rollout left part way is not the policy it appears to be; a subdomain policy weaker than the organisational one; a reporting address outside the domain, which needs an authorising record there or no reports arrive; and a tag DMARC does not define.
The wallet the 402 directs payment to. Its whole payment record — every payer, every chain — is on the merchant page.
Asset 0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913
The payTo wallet does not resolve to a registered ERC-8004 agent. That is not a verdict on the service — most of the catalog is unregistered.
Accepts
The payment requirements as published to the catalog. Read the live 402 before paying — a price here is a claim, not a quote.
Pay 0.18 USDC on Base to 0x25e8…a9608. The signed payment is good for 1 minute.
- Paid to
- 0x25e8…a9608
- USD Coin contract
- 0x8335…02913
- Payment window
- 1 minute
- As published
- 180000 smallest units
The catalog’s raw entry
[
{
"asset": "0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913",
"extra": {
"name": "USD Coin",
"version": "2"
},
"payTo": "0x25e8245f07d5e4873987293dad666afbe56a9608",
"amount": "180000",
"scheme": "exact",
"network": "eip155:8453",
"maxTimeoutSeconds": 60
}
]Extensions
{
"bazaar": {
"info": {
"input": {
"body": {
"domain": "example.test",
"record": "v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=25; rua=mailto:dmarc@reports.vendor.test; adkim=s; ri=86400; policy=strict"
},
"type": "http",
"method": "POST",
"bodyType": "json"
},
"output": {
"type": "json",
"example": {
"tags": {
"p": "quarantine",
"v": "DMARC1",
"ri": "86400",
"sp": "none",
"pct": "25",
"rua": "mailto:dmarc@reports.vendor.test",
"adkim": "s",
"policy": "strict"
},
"valid": false,
"domain": "example.test",
"limits": {
"maxRecords": 2000,
"maxFindings": 500,
"maxHeaderBytes": 131072,
"maxIncludeTree": 200,
"spfLookupLimit": 10,
"maxRecordLength": 4096,
"spfVoidLookupLimit": 2
},
"passed": false,
"policy": "quarantine",
"complete": true,
"findings": [
{
"tag": "pct",
"code": "POLICY_APPLIED_TO_PART_OF_MAIL",
"detail": "The record declares pct=25, so the policy applies to 25% of failing mail and the rest is treated as p=none. A rollout left here is not the policy it appears to be."
},
{
"tag": "sp",
"code": "SUBDOMAIN_POLICY_WEAKER",
"detail": "The record declares p=quarantine and sp=none, so a subdomain is treated more leniently than the organisational domain. Anything spoofing a subdomain gets the weaker treatment."
},
{
"tag": "rua",
"code": "REPORTING_TO_EXTERNAL_DOMAIN",
"detail": "The rua tag sends reports to reports.vendor.test, which is outside example.test. That requires reports.vendor.test to publish a record authorising it, and without one no reports are sent at all."
}
],
"percentage": 25,
"request_id": "example-request",
"service_id": "dmarc_record_audit",
"assumptions": [
"Nothing resolves DNS. The record is supplied, so an arbitrary domain can be audited without widening any egress.",
"A pct below 100 is reported because the tag applies to quarantine and reject and never to reporting, so a rollout left part way is routinely read as being further along than it is.",
"Reporting to a domain other than the one being audited is reported, because that needs an authorising record at the destination and without one no reports are sent at all."
],
"limitations": [
"The record supplied. Whether it is published, whether reports are actually received, and what any receiver does with the policy are outside this. Not a security assessment.",
"valid is true only when the record parsed, every tag was recognised, and nothing was left unexamined."
],
"observed_at": "2026-10-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"not_examined": [],
"finding_count": 4,
"spf_alignment": "r",
"dkim_alignment": "s",
"service_version": "1.0.0",
"findings_by_code": {
"TAG_NOT_RECOGNISED": 1,
"SUBDOMAIN_POLICY_WEAKER": 1,
"REPORTING_TO_EXTERNAL_DOMAIN": 1,
"POLICY_APPLIED_TO_PART_OF_MAIL": 1
},
"subdomain_policy": "none",
"forensic_reporting": null,
"aggregate_reporting": "mailto:dmarc@reports.vendor.test"
}
}
},
"schema": {
"type": "object",
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"required": [
"input"
],
"properties": {
"input": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"type",
"method",
"bodyType",
"body"
],
"properties": {
"body": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"record"
],
"properties": {
"domain": {
"type": "string",
"maxLength": 253
},
"record": {
"type": "string",
"maxLength": 4096
},
"require_reporting": {
"type": "boolean"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
},
"type": {
"type": "string",
"const": "http"
},
"method": {
"enum": [
"POST"
],
"type": "string"
},
"bodyType": {
"enum": [
"json",
"form-data",
"text"
],
"type": "string"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
},
"output": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"type"
],
"properties": {
"type": {
"type": "string"
},
"example": {
"type": "object"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}Provenance
- Seen in the source catalog
- 2026-10-04 08:41Z
- Last indexed by Roundhouse
- 2026-10-05 00:20Z
- Last enriched (probe, favicon, geo)
- 2026-10-05 16:46Z
- x402 version
- 2
- Max timeout
- 60s
- Liveness probe
- HTTP 0
Hand this page to an agent
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, an MCP client or your own agent — it will vet this service and call it over the free read API. No key, no account.
GET api.roundhouseai.io/v0/endpoints
No per-endpoint history for this service yet, so this is payments indexed to its PROVIDER's wallet over 30 days. Verified volume counts only settlements with an on-chain EIP-3009 marker.
Show the promptHide the prompt
Using Roundhouse, look up the x402 service DMARC Record Audit and tell me whether it is worth paying: what a call costs, whether the endpoint answered when last probed, and what its payment record actually shows. curl -s 'https://api.roundhouseai.io/v0/endpoints?q=DMARC%20Record%20Audit' curl -s 'https://api.roundhouseai.io/v0/merchants/<the payTo wallet returned above>' Then call it: read the price from the live 402 at https://api.zfinia.com/x402/v1/dmarc-record-audit, never from a cached figure, and pay with an x402 client. The /v0 API needs an API key (`authorization: Bearer rh_live_…`) on everything except /v0/unified* and /v0/endpoints. Either pay over x402 (mint a personal key for $0.01 at GET https://api.roundhouseai.io/v0/test/x402), or ask me for an organization key, which I create at https://roundhouseai.io/dashboard/connections. If you have neither, ask before going further. If you do not have Roundhouse tools or skills installed, read https://roundhouseai.io/skill.md first — it is the whole procedure.